In the
last few decades, there has been many studies released focusing on the
relationship between religion and spirituality, and, mental and physical
health. It has been argued that religious belief may in fact influence a
person's health. One topic of particular interest within this subject is
prayer. Prayer has come to be understood as a kind of treatment modality. It
has been thought of as a medicine to fight against disease. However, this argument
is somewhat irrational.
According
to Cohen and co, scientists seeking hard
evidence of prayer's curative powers misunderstand the nature of prayer in the
Western theistic traditions (2000). This contemporary way of linking prayer
with medicine is grounded in a basic misunderstanding of the nature and role of
prayer in religious traditions.
Although
these authors realise that religious belief may influence health, they are
sceptical about whether prayer can be tested scientifically. They highlight
that "no one can sincerely practice a faith for its health benefits"
(Cohen et al 2000). Religious adherents engage in prayers because that is where
they encounter God. Entering into prayer is entering into a personal relation
with the creator. So, true religious peoples do not pray solely to get their
needs met. They pray to meet their most fundamental need, their need for God.
In other words, praying is not a sure means of getting God to give humans their
way. Therefore, if one prays solely for selfish reasons, such as to rid illness,
the prayer is not essentially 'real,' it simply becomes a means to an end,
which it is not.
God is
not a means to a humans end. He is the End (Cohen et al 2000). So, prayer is
also not a means to an end, but an end in itself. Religious folk do not engage
in prayer for self-interest reasons. So, if prayer is carried out as an
experiment, it is not being carried out to help patient's recover but to see
what happens. It this light, it is not a 'real' prayer. One cannot simply ask
God for something and expect it to happen. Prayer does not work this way. It is
not a sure means of getting God to give humans their way. It can neither be
measured or verified.
Doctors
should therefore not possess the ability to prescribe religion or prayer as a
form of medicine. Religion and prayer is not a means to an end. It is not
something that someone can simply pick up and take, like medicine, to make
themselves feel better. It is not a drug. Religion and spirituality, and
therefore prayer, are not something someone can just decide they want because a
study says that there are connections between it and good health. Religion or
spirituality is so much more than a remedy for sickness. It is a way of life
and a person's belief system. So, prayer is not something a doctor can
prescribe a patient to do, especially if the patient is not religious at all.
Only a truly religious person understands the significance of prayer and the
importance of their spirituality, and therefore can reap the benefits from
their loving God. It should not be exploited or degraded. It is a special
connection between an adherent and their God.
Although
it can be recognised that religious conviction and a spiritual wellbeing can
promote good health and healing, doctors should not be specifically prescribing
religion as a treatment. However, clinicians should become comfortable
addressing basic spiritual and religious needs of a patient, such as their
religious history, supporting their beliefs and ensuring them access to
religious resources (Larimore et al 2000). When people become ill, they
constantly rely on their religious beliefs and practices to relieve stress,
take control, maintain hope and give their life meaning and purpose. So, it
would be illogical, senseless and uncaring to ignore a person's religiosity
altogether. It positively reduces the feeling of helplessness that accompanies
illness.
So,
clinicians, doctors and nurses should address the religious and spiritual needs
of a patient, but, these people should not be prescribing religion as a form of
medication. Religion, spirituality and prayer will not help people who are not
religious or spiritual themselves. Spirituality is not a means to an end but an
end in itself.
References
Cohen,
C.B., S.E. Wheeler, D.A. Scott, & the Anglican Working Group in Bioethics.
(2000). Prayer as therapy: A challenge to both religious belief and
professional ethics. The Hastings Center
Report 30: 40-47.
Larimore,
W.L., M. Parker, & M. Crowther. (2002). Should clinicians incorporate
positive spirituality into their practices? What does the evidence say? Annals of Behavioural Medicine 24:
69-73.
No comments:
Post a Comment